|

| Issue Number 18 |
No Charge
|
Spring 1999
|
In this issue we have the first installments of two series of articles
we plan to bring you over the next year.
The first series will cover fitness, fatigue and diet for shiftworkers.
We don't have figures on the average age of traincrews, but casual
observation shows that we're pushing 40 pretty hard. As we all age,
it is important for us to be aware of the personal issues we will
face. The first article in this series was inspired by a similar
program at CN.
The second series is from our Local Historian, John Holliday, who
has been digging through archives and dusty records in search of
stories that tell us why we are who we are.
In addition, Norm takes us to the circus, and Adrian leads us on.
He also seems to be having communication problems. Elvis has left
the building.
Also from CN, we have a contribution from the inimitable Rolly
Rails, late of Local 701's newsletter, "Newsline".
From Local 1778, Steve Edgar, Local Chair, speaks about the importance
of rest and nutrition.
We have honour of publishing a letter from the sister of our deceased
Brother Don Fink, two years after losing him and Brother Terry Gallis.
And finally, Bob Sharpe and Brian Gleason cover some hot topics.
The Old Cow Trail of '77
~ John Holliday Local Historian ~
In
1818, an agreement was reached between Great Britain and the United
States to divide the two countries from the Great Lakes to the Rockies
by the 49th parallel.
Not until June 15, 1846, was the Oregon Boundary Treaty signed,
which gave all of Vancouver Island to the British, and all land
south of the 49th parallel to the Americans.
Lieutenant Alexander Anderson was commissioned by the Hudson's
Bay company to find a practical fur trade route between Ft. Kamloops
and the Coast, north of the 49th parallel, to replace the Okanagan
Trail (The Old Fur Brigade Road) down to the Columbia River.
Leaving Ft. Kamloops on May 15, 1846, Anderson crossed the Fraser
River north of the Thompson River, and seeking to avoid the extremely
dangerous Fraser Canyon, headed west.
Following a short river to a lake, later named Seton (after a friend)
travelling by canoe, and portaging over a short distance of land
to another large lake, which was later named after himself.
Continuing overland, south from the west end of Anderson Lake,
to Lillooet Lake, this later became known as the Birkenhead (or
Mosquito) Portage. Across Lillooet Lake and Harrison Lake, Anderson
paddled down the Harrison River to the Fraser, and made it to the
coast in nine days.
The Hudsons Bay Company decided not to use this route. However,
when gold was discovered in the Cariboo in 1858, and until the Royal
sappers (Royal Engineers) could forge a wagon road through the Fraser
Canyon from Yale (completed in 1863) this would become the chief
access route for miners, travelling by steamboat and sailship from
Ft. Langley, New Westminster, Victoria, Seattle and San Fransisco
to Lillooet, (Mile 0) of the wagon trail to the gold fields at Wells
and Barkerville).
In the Spring of 1871, Canadian Pacific Railway began surveying
west from Ft. Edmonton, through the Yellowhead Pass, to the Coast.
One of the eleven different routes to the tidewater began near Clearwater,
on the North Thompson River. Travelling west to the headwaters of
the Bonaparte River to a point near Hat Creek, then south through
Marble Canyon, and past Pavilion to Lillooet.
In the spring of 1873 a C.P.R. survey crew was dropped off by boat
at the head of Howe Sound (Squamish). Following a route to Pemberton
explored by Hudsons Bay man Joseph MacKay in 1858, they cut
a supply trail for mule pack-trains. Up the Cheakamus Canyon, over
what is now Whistler Village to Green Lake. From there, they followed
Green River northward to Pemberton, and Port Douglas (on Lillooet
Lake), where the Old Harrison Wagon Road to Darcy (on Anderson
Lake) was still serviceable.
Of course these trading routes had been used by Native Indians
for centuries. By the fall of 1873, this formal survey to Lillooet
was complete.
Although it was soon abandoned by the C.P.R.. it was immediately
proposed for upgrading, to be used as a cattle trail by ranchers
north of Lillooet. Even though there were wagon roads at this time
(The Cariboo Trail, and The Dewdney) following the Thompson and
Fraser Rivers, they were not considered suitable for cattle.
Representing the ranchers, Legislators in Victoria approved funding
for the plan to begin construction and improvements to the trail
in the spring of 1874.
A portion of the trail was extended from the head of Howe Sound,
following the Stawamus and Seymour Rivers to Moodyville (North Vancouver)
on the Burrard Inlet.
The trail was completed in 1877, and one rancher and two cowboys
drove on herd of 200 cattle from Lillooet to North Vancouver, and
the rest is history.
The trail was not a success. The following is a 1910 BC Ministry
of Mines Report by William Robertson,
"This trail, although wonderfully picturesque, is anything
but desirable for what it was intended--driving cattle to salt
water--and is also singularly devoid of feed for horses or cattle,
a difficulty frequently met with in the mountain trails of the
coast, but fortunately uncommon in the trails of the interior."
~ John Holliday, Local Historian ~
Special thanks to Erik Johnson
"Sappers", 1987, Beth Johnson
"A Pictorial History of Railroading in
British Columbia", 1981, Barrie Sanford
Tales From Rails
~ Rolly Rails ~
You
may remember our old friend Rolly Rails, a regular contributor to
UTU Local 701's Newsletter, "Newsline". Well, Rolly's
still around, and as a result of an exclusive scoop by our intrepid
"Meeting Point" correspondents, Rolly sends us this poem.
Rolly doesn't know the author, but says that it covers the mixed
feelings he had when he retired from railroading.
So long, my friends. I've pulled the pin.
Scooped up my chips and cashed 'em in.
The game is through, I'll have to leave,
I know full well no one will grieve.
But that's the way it is, you know.
The time drifts by, we come and go.
In leaving, I'm not wholly glad;
The good days far surpassed the bad.
And those of you who knew me then,
Know I enjoyed the old CN,
The clanking car, the clicking wheel,
The smell of smoke and the smell of steel,
A lot of things like these I know
I'll miss them wherever else I go.
Perhaps we're all a bit this way
For none of us was forced to stay.
I'll even miss some things like these:
The summer's heat, the winter's freeze,
The rain's wet slap that blinds and stings,
The lashing wind that howls and sings,
Thunder and lightning that split the night,
Filling the sky with jagged light.
So whether tramping down the lead
Or walking a cut of cars to bleed,
Dragging out and shoving in,
Throwing switches, pulling pins,
Climbing ladders, passing signs
On yard tracks, sidings, or on mainlines.
It's been our life. We're all the same
Where railroads have been our game.
We're here for a while and then we're gone
But the trains keep rolling on and on,
And so, once more, goodbye old friends.
My life of railroading ends.
BC Rail Jeopardized, Liberal MLA Says
Vancouver Sun, Feb. 26, 1999
Richard Neufeld, the Liberal member of the legislature for Peace
River North, has warned the NDP government against any further increase
in the BC Rail Dividend in its upcoming budget.
The government has demanded BC Rail pay a $61 million dividend
by the end of 1998-99, Neufeld said, nine per cent more than the
$56 million paid last year.
Meanwhile, the corporation reported a profit of only $40-million
for 1997, which means it is having to borrow money to pay these
dividends.
"The NDP is placing the future of BC Rail in jeopardy because
at its current rate of debt increase, the corporation will become
insolvent in less than 10 years," he said.
He noted that BC Rail is carrying a debt of $540 million and has
been forced to sell its Westel telecommunications subsidiary for
$55 million to meet the NDP's dividend demands.
Pedestrians Told to Wear Reflective Clothes
Vancouver Sun, Feb. 6, 1999
Vancouver police reminded pedestrians of the value of bright clothing
after a 71-year-old victim became the fourth person in the city
this year to be struck and killed by a vehicle.
Irene Brown was struck and killed by a vehicle travelling at high
speed in the 300 block of West 41st Avenue around 7:30
p.m. Thursday, Constable Anne Drennan said Friday.
She said charges are being contemplated against a 16-year-old driver
of the vehicle.
"Perhaps if she had a reflective stripe or reflective arm
band on her clothing it might have been different," said Drennan.
All four traffic fatalities in the city this year have involved
pedestrians. "All four of the victims so far have been wearing
dark clothing," Drennan said.
Lead
Me On
Apologies to Eric Clapton, LP: The Journeyman
Tell me anything you think I wanna hear
Just to keep my train standin here
To secure your connection fears
Tell me you need us, but in your heart you know you dont
So lie cause you think I want
To make believe you need us when you dont
CHORUS:
Lead me on, lead me on
Lead me on, lead me on
I wont play along and along and along
Chief lead me on
Lead me on
Pretend the traffics hot when you know its not
And my dinner break gets a firm "NOT!"
And everythings gonna be alright
And its a shame, ten hours is the game
And you know Im not the one
To bring your train in at ten plus one
TO CHORUS
And when I leave to go to work for you
You cry youre stressed out too
To make me go along with you.
But on Channel 2 I hear you slip and tell all
I hear you calling out a relief crews name
You say you need them again and again
TO CHORUS:
~ Adrian Telizyn ~
Circus
By Norm Abrahams
Come one, come all
Let's have a ball
We're going to the circus
There will be secret pacts
And high wire acts
It's all here at the circus
There's trains to run
My, what fun!
Only at the circus
See officials jump through hoops
Wriggling their way through the loops
A barrel of fun at the circus
Seals clapping all in a row
Giving praise to the CEO
What fun at the circus
People shot from cannons in the dark
Had a job, miss the mark
It's all here at the circus
The
Union Is Who?
Most people feel that the "Union" is the Executive Board,
the people who "Run" the union. This could not be further
from the truth. "The Union" is YOU! YOU are the one who
elects YOUR officials to represent YOU. YOU are the one who has
the privilege to go to YOUR meetings and speak what's on YOUR mind,
to let YOUR board know of any grievance YOU may have. A strong Union
is only as strong as its members. Show YOUR employer YOU mean business,
show them YOU stand behind YOUR union, attend meetings, report infractions
by the employer to YOUR shop steward or local when they occur. YOU
will never agree with 100% of what YOUR local does or doesn't do.
But it is important that YOU get past that and carry on and continue
fighting for YOUR rights. YOU are the eyes and ears of the Union.
Without YOU...There would be no "_nion"! Remember, Union
starts with...U...N...I
Calling Scooter
Sung to the tune "Calling Elvis", by Dire Straits
Calling Scooter - is anybody home?
Calling Scooter - I'm here all alone
Did he leave the Esplanade?
Or can he come to the phone?
Calling Scooter - I'm here all alone
Can you tell him I was calling just to wish him well
Don't cut my budget - right to the bone
Let me leave out the job numbers - please don't be cruel
Return my proposals to sender - pay me like a fool
Calling Scooter - is anybody home?
Calling Scooter - I'm here all alone
Did he leave the Esplanade?
Can he come to the phone?
Calling Scooter - I'm here all alone
Why don't you go get him - I'm his biggest TS
You gotta tell him - he's still the man
Fort Nelson baby - so far from home
Don't you think maybe you could put him on?
Can you tell him I was calling just to wish him well
Don't cut my budget - right to the bone
Let me leave out the job numbers - please don't be cruel
Return my proposals to sender - pay me like a fool
Calling Scooter - is anybody home
Calling Scooter - I'm here all alone
Did he leave the Esplanade
Can he come to the phone
Calling Scooter - I'm here all alone
~ Adrian Telizyn ~
Fraternally Yours
~ Steve Edgar, Local Chairperson, Local 1778 ~
The
following is a true story. At 00:15 the phone rings. Its the
crew office with a call for a 02:15 VC. Arrive a few minutes before
the ordered time, do the usual paper work and depart. When O/S'
ing out of town request for a meal break. Five hours go by the trip
is progressing as usual, nothing out of the ordinary, then the TCS
calls to state you cant stop your train to eat. The crew has
been at work for five hours and still has five hours to go. Crew
arrives at the away from home terminal at 12:30, after 10 hours
15 minutes on duty.
They were denied the right to stop the train to have an uninterrupted
hot meal, now they have to make a decision (go right to bed or stay
up a while). They call the TCS to see when there south bound train
will be ordered, he states 21:00. Based on that information they
decide to have a bite to eat and go to bed as they havent
eaten a real meal today. By the time they get to bed its about 14:30.
They awake at 20:30, no call yet. They go down stairs to see what
time the call is coming. The new TCS on duty states 00:30 or 01:00.
Now they're awake, they make some breakfast, watch some TV and try
to get some more sleep. They get a 30 minute call at 00:30 for 01:00.
The managed to get an hour more sleep.
When the crew departs they make a request for a meal break. About
six hours go by, the crew has had a few delays with meets and push,
TCS calls to state that there close to their hours so they cant
stop to eat. The crew carries on and they have another bad meet.
It looks like theyre not going to make it in on their ten
hours. They call for relief or rest on their hours. A supervisor
calls them up and states that there being unreasonable in requesting
relief and orders the crew in. Fearing for their job, the crew complies
with the orders of the supervisor, and brings the train in
.
Thats when I get involved as Local Chairperson. I contacted
the supervisor to ask about his actions. I asked if he considered
the safety of the crew and the public when the crew has worked those
kind of hours. He stated that he had not considered that.
After reviewing this incident, it is my opinion that this supervisor
has little or no respect for the collective agreement which his
company has signed. This crew lived up to their contractual obligation.
It seems to me that the supervisor never considered the safety of
the crew, or the events that led them to ask for rest or relief.
I believe the company failed at their contractual obligation to
the employee.
Some time ago I was approached by a supervisor who he said he didnt
see anything wrong with working us over our hours. I asked if on
the nights that we were really tired would he let us off early?
We all know his answer.
If this type of incident happens to you, and you require rest,
do not go beyond the siding where you can store your train before
your hours are up, but do not tie up on the main track unless instructed
by the RTC. This type of incident happened a few years ago and when
the management of the day realized what they had done, they dropped
it during the hearing process.
We are, as stated in Article 122, THE JUDGE OF OUR OWN CONDITION
~ Steve Edgar, Local Chair 1778 ~
Meeting Point is published four times yearly for the information
and entertainment of the members of United Transportation Union
Locals 1778 and 1923 (BC Rail).
The Editors of Meeting Point support the concept of free speech
and welcome any submissions that may be of interest to our members.
Submissions may be made to any Union Officer, E-mail utu@telus.net
or our Web page at http://www.ultranet.ca/utu/
Submissions become the property of Meeting Point. We reserve the
right to edit for brevity and clarity. The opinions contained herein
are not necessarily those of the Editors or the United Transportation
Union.
Deadline for submissions: 15 th of Mar, June, Sept., Dec
Letter to UTU Members
March
12,1999
To Members or the U.T.U.:
As the 2nd anniversary of the deaths of my brother,
Don Fink, and Terry Gallis, approaches, I think of the many special
people who treated us with kindness and compassion. Throughout the
horror of the accident and the anguish of awaiting confirmation
of their deaths, we were comforted and cared for by your members,
in particular John and Brenda Halen, Don Keele, Barry Gray, Duke
Deline and Dave DeJonckheere. I apologize to those I have missed,
as you can imagine some of those days are clouded memories.
There have been positive changes made following the inquest and
I hope that lives have been spared as a result of these changes.
I do believe that Don and Terry did not die in vain. The belief
that their deaths have in some way saved others is the fuel that
has allowed us to heal.
I wish to acknowledge the very hard work and commitment of Brian
Gleason, who represented the U.T.U. interests at the inquest into
Don and Terry's deaths. He worked to keep our interests in the forefront
and to ensure that our questions were answered. Larry Campbell,
Chief Coroner for British Columbia, presided over the inquest and
pressed for answers as to why this accident occurred and then made
his recommendations to protect the public safety and the lives of
Railroaders. I would also like to thank Pierre Trottier for his
continued support and expertise on matters of safety. Ross Rykyta
was a part of the momentum to name stars in Don and Terry's memory,
thus creating a celestial address for them, a symbol of everlasting
energy.
In times of tragedy, part of healing is to gain something positive
from the loss. I have gained a deep respect for the members of the
railroad community. I witnessed your pain at the loss of your brothers
and your strength to push for change. My family and I felt privileged
to share your stories and gain some insight into why Don loved his
railroading years and working the road with so many of you. He was
a fortunate man in many ways. You've honored Don and Terry in many
ways, know that we are deeply touched by all your gestures.
The Royal Commission on Workers' Compensation in British Columbia
released it's final report January 20,1999. One area that came under
strong criticism was how the WCB deals with fatality investigations.
Compensation for survivors is recognized as being insufficient and
changes have been recommended. I submitted a report to the Royal
Commission before the inquest and as a result of my interest I have
become connected to a group entitled Survivors for Change.
April 28 is the National Day of Mourning to honor workers killed
on the job. I am involved in organizing a gathering at the Legislative
buildings here in Victoria on April 28. I would appreciate your
ideas for making this a memorable day. I would also like the names
of your members killed on the job as we would like to prepare a
roll call of those workers who have lost their lives. There are
plans for a caravan coming from the mainland. Should any of you
wish to take part in this gathering please contact me for more information
at 1-250-477-0452.
Thank you for all your support.
Shirley MacEachern
|
General Chairperson's Column
|
Phone: (604) 434-8075
Fax:(604) 434-9380 |
~ Bob Sharpe ~
|
Cell: (604) 220-3488
rksharpe@axionet.com
|
I have decided to devote the majority of this column to an issue
which has been addressed numerous times at meetings and which individual
members have asked questions - the issue of members driving company
vehicles. I have included a letter from Canadian Legislative Director,
Brother Tim Secord to Local Chairperson, Brother Monte Rutzki (CN)
regarding his members being ordered to drive company vehicles. It
points out the importance of having proper legal protection in the
collective agreement.
As you should all be well aware, the UTU on BC Rail negotiated
Article 146 which states, "No employee in the course of his
duties will be required to operate a company vehicle." This
article was negotiated to provide our membership protection against
the questions our Brothers and Sisters at CN are now addressing.
I would advise all members to read the following letter and keep
it in mind when it comes to the issue of driving a company vehicle
(letter below).
Mr. M. Rutzki
Dear Sir and Brother:
With respect to the questions you posed regarding the above
noted subject matter, please consider the following.
For the time being, until this office and that of the General
Chairperson can iron this matter out, the following should be
strongly considered.
Should the employer order an employee (our member) to drive
a CN vehicle, the employee would presumably have to follow the
"obey now, grieve later" rule. This would apply only
in the instances where the employee had an appropriate driver's
license, had suitable rest, and was physically and mentally
capable of performing the task.
The employee being forced to drive a company vehicle under
such circumstances should make his local chairperson and safety
committee member aware of the incident and report it to them
in writing.
Should the employee who is directed to drive the vehicle become
involved in an accident where the other occupants of the vehicle
become injured, although it is not clear at this juncture as
to what the liabilities are, to err on the safe side would be
to surmise that the driver could be held liable. We will be
obtaining a legal opinion on this matter forthwith.
For your information, I have asked the Provincial Legislative
chairpersons to provide me with information pertaining to the
type of vehicle insurance in place within their respective jurisdictions
and the following may have an impact on the outcome of further
dealings on this matter.
Nova Scotia, new Brunswick and Alberta have a "tort"
insurance system that requires personal damage and personal
liability coverage. British Columbia, Ontario and Saskatchewan
have a no-fault system. I have not received a response to my
inquires from Manitoba or Quebec at this time and cannot offer
any information on the type of insurance schemes available or
in place within those two provinces at this time.
Should the member (driver) or any of the passengers have some
reason to believe that this would be unsafe (even unlawful),
they have the right to refuse unsafe work under Part II of the
Code. This may not be the best solution but it may get them
past the directive to drive the vehicle. I am not suggesting
they do so, only advising that this is a possibility.
By copy of this letter to the General Chairpersons, I am requesting
that they look into this matter with a view to addressing it
with the Company at the earliest opportunity. I have included
the e-mail transmissions as enclosures in order to bring all
concerned up to speed on the issues you raise. In the meantime,
I will seek advise from legal counsel on this matter and provide
it to you and the membership as soon as it becomes available.
Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention and I trust
we can get this resolved to our mutual benefit and satisfaction.
With kind regards I am,
In solidarity
T.S. Secord
Canadian Legislative Director
These are precisely the reasons why Article 146 was negotiated
and why we have continually advised, and continue to advise the
membership not to operate company vehicles.
Contract Negotiations
Contract negotiations are at an impasse. The Council has only one
demand on the table: 0%, 0%, 2% (1998, 1999, 2000) on wages, and
the collective agreements to remain whole. This is in accordance
with PSEC guidelines. The railway has numerous proposals plus the
demand for a 20% reduction in the unionized payroll still on the
table. The railway's position seems rather out of touch with the
labour climate of the day. All settlements in the public sector
to date have been based on 0-0-2% and the collective agreements
remaining whole....not concession bargaining!
The GC of A will be making a trip over the property in the near
future. Notices will be coming out when we will be in your terminal
and I hope as many of you as possible will come out for the meetings.
~ Bob Sharpe, General Chairperson, GO 759 ~
Legislative Rep's Column
~ Brian Gleason, Local 1778 ~
HOW CUTE IT IS
"For example, CUTE local 1 (representing engineers at BC Rail)
pay less in dues then UTU members and yet have fewer members. Despite
their higher dues and more dues paying members the UTU has had on
occasion had to borrow money from CUTE local 1 in order to enable
its representatives to represent their members at tribunals."
- From CUTE correspondence.
This is an example of the lies and character assassination that
have typified CUTEs attempted RAID of the United Transportation
Union (UTU) and Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers (BLE) at CP
Rail. The only time that I recall money changing hands between the
UTU and CUTE was when CUTE wanted us to attach their name to a brief
that was prepared by the UTU. They were advised that if they wanted
to once again have their name attached to work done by the UTU,
they would be expected to pay their share.
Perhaps their dues are slightly less than ours, lets have a look
at the reasons why. First and foremost we represent the interest
of our membership in many different forums, and we support the Labour
movement as a whole, not just our own self interest. The UTU participates
on federation legislative committees and Health and Safety committees
in this province and throughout this country. We fight to have legislation
enacted that will benefit all working people. Labour legislation,
Health and Safety legislation, changes to the Railway Act and regulations
that affect us every day of our working lives. Changes to the Workers
Compensation Act, the Employment Insurance Act, pension legislation,
Medicare, the list goes on. Our members throughout this province
and country participate in Labour Councils, making sure that railway
workers have a voice in the labour movement. Our Union is politically
active. What does CUTE do?
We fought a long, drawn out and expensive arbitration in the 1990's
to protect the jobs of our members as a result of CCO operations.
Part of the reason we were in that position, was that the representatives
of CUTE locals 1 (Locomotive Engineers) CUTE local 6 (Maintenance
of Way) on the Council of Trade Unions on BC Rail voted to force
us into that process (this is not the first time we have been stabbed
in the back). As an aside, when CUTE local 6 was looking for support
for their members for an across the board increase, as opposed to
a percentage increase, to raise the wages of the lowest paid workers,
their brothers in CUTE local 1 would not support them, the UTU did.
CUTE local 1 enjoys many of the benefits that we fought for as a
result of this arbitration, such as engine conditions and shorter
days. What does CUTE do?
The UTU at BC Rail has published a newsletter and maintained a
website for the last five years in order to keep our membership
involved and informed. This year nine members from our two locals
at BC Rail attended the Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) Winter School
for one week to attend courses in WCB, collective bargaining, facing
management, parliamentary procedure, health and safety, labour law,
ECT. At this years school they will meet and learn with fellow railway
workers from across the country and from many different railways,
as well as other sisters and brothers from Unions affiliated with
the CLC. Every year we provide education to our members and representatives.
Does CUTE educate their membership? What does CUTE do?
At BC Rail, I would estimate that for every WCB claim that CUTE
local 1 has, the UTU has twenty, that is the nature of our work.
That is why we are constantly training members at the local level
to deal with WCB. Local Representatives also have provincial legislative
boards that will handle WCB appeals and pay the costs for medical/legal
opinions, if required. Has CUTE provided education to any of their
members to represent them with WCB claims? What does CUTE do?
I was recently provided with an unsigned copy of a letter, apparently
from Mr. Szeplaky, President, CUTE national, addressed to all CUTE
national members, dated November 13, 1998. Mr. Szeplaki provides
a rather humorous (although not very factual) history lesson of
the creation of CUTE and the circumstances leading up to the present
RAID at CP Rail. The first issue to be dealt with is who is "CUTE
national." CUTE representatives describe CUTE national as a
filing cabinet in a house in Prince George. Realistically, CUTE
national is the membership of the two locals referred to earlier,
with approximately 200 Engineers and 400 Maintenance of way workers
working at BC Rail. One could certainly argue that the name CUTE
national is a bit of a misnomer. Mr. Szeplaki advises that he has
not had a lot of success strengthening CUTE national and our only
real contribution (to the CCU) was paying dues, but all that has
changed quite suddenly. What does CUTE do?
Mr. Szeplaki attacks the UTU and postulates as to the feelings
of the UTU membership, something that he knows very little about.
He speaks of the courageous, idealistic people having secret meetings
under threats of the usual intimidation tactics as they attempt
to RAID another union. Mr. Szeplaki and CUTE should examine the
history of the UTU in the labour movement, as well as their history
of organizing and standing up for the rights of railway workers.
He could learn something of the real intimidation and violence that
members of the UTU and their predecessors were subjected to as they
fought for the rights of railway workers. He could learn something
about courage and ideals, as well as honesty and integrity. Mr.
Szeplaki and CUTE appear to be distressed that the UTU would defend
itself against the false claims, innuendo, and character assassination
that CUTE has perpetrated. He advises that he has turned the matter
over to their legal counsel for consideration. It appears that CUTE
can dish it out, but they cant take it.
CUTE has spent a lot of time, energy and money attacking the UTU,
BLE and the Canadian Labour Congress, as well as other labour organizations.
In my opinion, the manner in which their representatives have been
behaving has made them the laughingstock of the labour movement.
I do not believe that buffoonery, yelling, screaming and being rude
and ignorant to others furthers anybodys cause, the membership
suffers in the end. Perhaps the CUTE membership needs examine their
own organization and put their house in order, before going out
and attacking others.
Local 1778 Has A Winner!
Congratulations to Brother Richard Girard, who was among five UTU
Canada members chosen by lottery for an all expenses paid scholarship
to attend the Regional Meeting in Washington DC. this July.
The members were chosen from among five candidates submitted by
the executive of each Canadian local. The candidates had to be members
in good standing and could not hold office in the union. Each winner
is expected to attend workshops presented at the meeting and submit
a report of their three day attendance.
Congratulations also to the other winners,
Steve Capotinsky
Local 691, Kamloops
Ross Duff
Local 1894, Winnipeg
Paul Fletcher
Local 1828, Edmonton
Don Rowe
Local 351, Winnipeg

|